We're
working our way through the book Questioning the Bible (Jonathan Morrow).
His next chapter deals with the issue of whether the Bible has been corrupted
over the centuries. Some people worry about passages like John 8:1-13 or Mark
16:9-20, where Bible footnotes indicate these passages were not found in the
earliest manuscripts. So, the key question is simple: how do we know that what
was written in the first century is what we have today in the 21st century?
Let's take a look at what he says.
He starts
off by talking about something called the telephone game. People sit in a
circle while one person whispers a message to the player on his right who then
turns to the next person and repeats the message. By the time it makes it around to
the original whisperer, the message is usually wildly different. Some people
suggest this is a good analogy for how the New Testament was transmitted.
However,
it's a bad analogy. Why? First, the telephone game is linear (from one person
to the second to the third…), But the New Testament gospels in the copying process were not done that way. There
are multiple lines of transmission within the original documents which were probably
copied several times. We have access to earlier copies to compare with later
copies. In addition, the telephone game is verbal, but the text was written,
with the result that the words and phrases can be examined along the way.
Finally, when we play the telephone game, life or death usually do not hang in
the balance. There would've been a high degree of motivation among the copiers
to get the message right.
The author
then turns to textual criticism, the practice of reconstruction for ancient
texts. There are three fundamental questions when it comes to reconstructing
the New Testament – how many manuscripts do we have? How early are these
manuscripts? How important are the textual variants (differences) among these manuscripts?
Let's start
with how many manuscripts are available. The answer is that we have a wealth of
material with nearly 6000 Greek New Testament manuscripts, as many as 20,000
translated versions, and more than 1 million quotations by early church
fathers. In comparison with the average ancient Greek author, the New Testament
copies are well over one thousand times more plentiful. This gives us an opportunity to
examine these different manuscripts to look for any wildly different stories,
but they aren't there.
Let's deal
with the other two questions in the next blog.
Hi Gary. Are you related to Ravi? Do you have an opinion on is false claim to have been a "visiting scholar it Cambridge University" and other misleading statements? Let me know?
ReplyDeletehttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q2KSBk9Anqw&app=m&persist_app=1
Sorry about the typos. I don't know how to edit them out, and I'm sitting at the airport gate using my iPhone.
ReplyDeleteI would guess that after 2000 years nothing remains pure or consistent except God. But as to the Greek manuscripts, this is only partially correct since these original Greek manuscripts were also translations from Aramaic and Hebrew in many cases. Therefore, even the Greek manuscripts are not pure in the sense of authenticity. But regardless, how are you professor? If you happen to get this, feel free to contact me. I would love to catch up...it has probably been about 12 - 13 years.
ReplyDelete-Andy