Bart Ehrman
is a skeptic when it comes to the Bible. One of his arguments is that most of
the books in the New Testament were forged. He has said a large number of books
in the early church were written by authors who falsely claimed to be apostles
in order to deceive their readers into accepting their books and the views they
represented. This is one challenge that Jonathan Morrow is taking on in his
book Questioning the Bible.
He starts by
saying authorship is usually determined by several factors. First, there are
external factors such as comments by other writers or historical corroboration.
In addition, there are internal factors like the claims of the author, his
style, and theology. He also says it's important to notice if the document was
disputed by those closest to its composition, also known as historical
proximity. He notes that the twenty-seven documents contained in the New
Testament are the earliest Christian writings in existence and therefore the
closest to the resurrection event.
One of his
key points is that Christians in the first century were able to write well. The
earliest Christians were Jewish and highly valued reading, writing, and explaining
the Hebrew Scriptures. So, the earliest Christians were not ignorant peasants
unaware of the literary practices of the day.
Regarding
forgeries, Morrow makes three points. First, forgeries certainly existed in the
ancient world, but they were rejected when discovered. Secondly, forgeries did
occur among some early Christian writings, but Christians rejected them when
they were discovered. Third, and most importantly, there is no reason to think
that a known forgery made it into the New Testament canon. Church fathers
understood that the apostles were the authorized agents of the new covenant
message and documents. Therefore, if the writings were not apostolic in origin,
they were not regarded as authoritative.
The author
asks a couple of key questions which I would like to save for next time – Do
forgeries now exist in the New Testament canon? Who wrote the four Gospels?
No comments:
Post a Comment