Recently I watched a video in which Benno Schmidt, former
president of Yale, was interviewed regarding academic freedom. He had some
interesting things to say.
First, he said academic freedom used to be for the
protection of faculty from outside influences. Trustees leaned on professors to
adhere to a particular “ism,” so the faculty needed protection.
But now the problem is interference from within the
university. Suppression has come from faculty members themselves. Teachers have
had their careers ruined, their tenures postponed or never established, their
names besmirched because their ideology didn’t match what others wanted it to
be. In addition, speakers representing
unpopular views have been heckled or refused the chance to share their ideas.
Students themselves have become targets. Faculty often
punish them or make fun of them for views their professors don’t agree with. Many
teachers try to indoctrinate those in their classrooms.
Schmidt sees the need for trustees to defend academic
freedom from the new totalitarians in administration and the faculty. It’s
ironic that those on the left who espouse tolerance are the ones behind most of
these new witch hunts. Schmidt ends by asking for true tolerance, rather than
blind adherence to the fad of the day.
I say, “Good luck.” The left will never agree to this
because they are right, don’t you see. It’s not a struggle of two viewpoints to
them—it’s right versus wrong. I don’t see this changing soon. The American
university is now firmly in the hands of leftists with a serious agenda to wipe
out all dissent.
No comments:
Post a Comment